IPO Facilitation - Socio-Economic Disinformation and The Powerful "Roadblock Chaos Strategy" | The Communication Blog

Friday, January 7, 2011

IPO Facilitation - Socio-Economic Disinformation and The Powerful "Roadblock Chaos Strategy"

By James Scott


Political and corporate strategies merge and in the end the same 'chaos injection' and 'roadblock' mechanism of controlling the self-proclaimed 'uncontrollable' parallel each other when strategies of war and economics come together as the invisible hands that can reach in and attach strings to the soul making the populace the marionette of agenda driven managers. Control is the name of the game when setting up a process to maintain and guide a group, individual or movement along the path desired.

Implementing strategies that yield the desired outcome comes down to the action of setting up roadblocks and challenges to cater to man's innate motivation to take the path of least resistance and minimal effort. Catering to the 'ego' via subconscious triggers in the news, local, national and international leadership including religious leaders is how control is established quickly and efficiently.

There are two basic types of people that should be the center of focus when implementing this strategy for the fastest results, those who wear a designer label on their chest and those who wear their religion on their sleeve. Each of these groups are, in reality, in search of identity, legitimacy, inclusion in a concept larger than themselves, a voice and by projecting a 'brand' larger than themselves they are attempting to gain the personal level of legitimacy that the brand, as a whole, has in their immediate environment.

Another reality of the above groups is that by blatantly causing a reaction in the population around them with their 'brand cause' they are making an attempt to convince themselves of the solidity and legitimacy of their belief.

Those who either don't wear deliberate representations of brands or bring up the concept of their religious curiosity are typically more reserved, self-assured and less easy to bypass the subconscious critical faculty. The former two groups should be at the forefront of one's focus if they are to truly step in and control the actions of those who are, well, asking to be controlled.

Engineering a roadblock system is actually much easier to do than one may imagine. A master of this method is the United States government. The establishment makes little people feel important by their 'get out and vote' and 'audacity of hope' propaganda campaigns that convince the masses that their individual ballot counts in the critical presidential election and they their vote can change the course of the election. A perfect example of this is the Florida incident between Bush and Kerry. The media convinced the public that the election outcome came down to a few votes in a few towns in the single state of Florida, when, in reality this was far from reality as it is the Electoral College that elects the president and each state is strategically issued a certain number of votes that, when tactics are implemented properly via media propaganda, Sunday sermons concept 'seeds' and university 'I'm searching for my identity' activism perpetuated by agenda driven university idealists. The entire ordeal in Florida injected scores of post hypnotic cues and mind seeds that can be triggered down the road for a desirable outcome which will be crucial as the government is gradually taking away rights with the Patriot Act agenda. Think about it, Americans are giving away their constitutional rights by the boatload and not a single peep from anyone on the right or left. For those who step up to bring attention to what's going on, there are a series of roadblocks set in-place like a crisis management template that takes away the legitimacy of the source and limits their access to publicity via media control.

The same can be done with a corporation. If I had a penny for every propaganda and crisis management contract that I've been offered, I'd be able to pay off the national deficit (ok that's a far stretch but you get the point). Obviously as a boutique firm we only choose the projects that cater to our direct skill set so we pay attention to corporate genre, industry niche, C level pedigree, board organization and pedigree and what the potential client is actually trying to achieve. For the most part, though they are afraid to say it, they want mind control over clients, potential clients and shareholders. That's really what they want to achieve when they make statements like, "we need a way to get our information to the public in a way that is conducive to investor confidence and client satisfaction" or "we need a crisis management template put together for problem one, problem two and potential problem three so that our stock doesn't plummet and so clients to stop buying". What they want, what they are really after, is the ability to take an idea and distribute this idea in a way that enters into the mind and emotion like a multi-pronged fishing hook that once swallowed is virtually impossible to remove. But how does the company get the public to swallow? Easy, it's like giving candy to a baby, literally.

Though a majority of the population believes in the 'idea' of free will, the reality is that the end result of their free will is usually the direct result set in motion by an outside source that sees the individual as a target to control. Predicting the outcome of the so called free will is really just a path with roadblocks that guide the individual through a maze with the smell of 'personal gain' and 'ego satisfaction' leading them to the outcome that was set in motion by the tacticians and strategist who have been charting their path with road blocks and encouraging movement with emotional drivers via media, religion, education and peer pressure.

This strategy can be applied to any business, political campaign or agenda. It's just a matter of having the proper support mechanism in place to influence the pawn.




About the Author:



The Communication Blog
Bookmark and Share

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The Communication Blog Copyright © 2009